Matt Turner wrote:
Oliver,Jay. Since we don't support < EV5, would it be save to use those instead?BWX appeared in the EV56, and MVI appeared in PCA56 (the generation after EV56). So the real question is: do you want to support >EV5, EV56, or >PCA56. Obviously >PCA56 is the easiest, plus, who still uses a plain EV5?
Oh. Right... /me was wrong :-(Well, I need at least EV56 compatibility (because of my AS4100 and AS1000(A))...
I don't know what other users are running... But I'd guess >= EV56.Guys, what do you think would happen if a binary compiled with BXW/MVI would run on < EV56?
-of