[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Secondary architectures and marketing
- From: Måns Rullgård <mans mansr com>
- To: Axp-list redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Secondary architectures and marketing
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:53:19 +0000
"Matt Turner" <mattst88 gmail com> writes:
> Given the previous examples, I rhetorically ask wouldn't it be
> beneficial to work on a sole distribution, thereby preventing this
> wasteful duplication of effort.
I completely agree that all of us working on the same distribution
would be the most efficient. It seems, however, that some people are
hell-bent on running Fedora no matter what.
Instead of bickering over which distribution is superior, I suggest we
try to find ways of cooperating as much as possible. A common place
to share patches should avoid the kind of duplicated efforts discussed
earlier in this thread.
Does this sound sensible?
--
Måns Rullgård
mans mansr com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]