[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Secondary architectures and marketing



Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Alan Young <ayoung teleport com> wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Oliver Falk <oliver linux-kernel at>
wrote:
Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Oliver Falk <oliver linux-kernel at>
wrote:
[ ... ]
After working on the problem, Jay independently came to the exact
solution Gentoo arrived at before. This, by definition, is duplication
of effort.
Yes. That's duplication of effort. And as Jay said. Why did that happen?
Because of the lack of communication. See my other mail. A common axp
patches store would help a lot in this case.
What about something like patchwork?
http://patchwork.kernel.org/

If everyone send patches to the list, at least they'd end up in one place.

Alex

Is patchwork limited to vger lists (linux-alpha)?  Or can it track non-vger
lists?  If it could monitor the various lists (linux-alpha, redhat-axp,
gentoo-alpha, debian-alpha, etc.) that could help to bring patches together.

I don't know off hand, but I suspect just vger lists.  One could do
something similar for alpha lists.

http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/

We could run this somewhere for *us* (various distro alpha m/l) + axp-list.

What you think?

-of


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]