Re: dectalk etc. vs soundblaster (fwd)

[Ken Perry <whistler blinksoft com>]

Many dos speech packages already allow you to use a soundblaster but I
have found them all to be slow and not worth dealing with of corse with a
good coder that is bored I am sure this slowness could be over come.

Ken /whistler

On Sun, 26 Jan 1997, Hans Zoebelein wrote:

> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: 26 Jan 1997 00:24:50 -0000
> From: Lar Kaufman <lark world std com>
> To: blinux-list-request redhat com
> Subject: dectalk etc. vs soundblaster
> 
> 
> I'm puzzled about something.  Just how high is the barrier to getting
> drivers written to go directly from emacspeak and other text-to-voice
> packages to output for any soundblaster-compatible audio card?  Just
> about *any* audio card claims compatibility with the original 8-bit
> Soundblaster.
> 
> -lar
>   Lar Kaufman    lark world std com     lark conserve org    lark walden com
>    +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +
>   _Running Linux_ 2nd. Ed. Aug. 1996, Matt Welsh and Lar Kaufman, Authors
>                                       O'Reilly & Associates, Publishers
> 
> ---
> Send your message for blinux-list to blinux-list redhat com
> Blinux software archive at ftp://leb.net/pub/blinux
> Blinux web page at http://leb.net/blinux
> To unsubscribe send mail to blinux-list-request redhat com
> with subject line: unsubscribe
>