Re: Re: issues with X Window

[Paolo Molaro <lupus lettere unipd it>]

On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 04:05:10PM -0500, mark novak wrote:
> You are correct that Ultrasonix isn't classically "open source" (as in, it's
> not covered by the GPL or any such license).  But it is freely available for
> any non-commercial use, experimentation, etc.
> 
> See http://www.parc.xerox.com/kedwards/mercator.html for details on the
> project, source code, licensing issues, etc.

Thanks. I didn't look at the code, but read the papers and the research 
you've done!

> The project is no longer being worked on by the original developers.  But
> if anyone is interested in trying to obtain a more flexible license, I'd
> recommend contacting the Georgia Tech technology licensing office.  I would
> expect them to be quite accomodating and reasonable.  Personally I would have
> no problems with any of this code moving to an open source arrangement.

Thanks for your support!
I guess we need to contact all the original authors or is the copyright 
assigned to Georgia Tech?
Hope things wil go well with the licensing issue.

lupus

-- 
lupus debian org
Se devo emigrare in America, come mio nonno, prendo il tram!        [F.G.]
If I have to emigrate to America, like my grandfather, I'll take the tram.