[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: what to do with fls(x) (or device-mapper & swsusp-1.x.x ? )
- From: Joe Thornber <thornber sistina com>
- To: Svetoslav Slavtchev <svetljo gmx de>
- Cc: dm-devel sistina com, lvm-devel sistina com, thornber sistina com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: what to do with fls(x) (or device-mapper & swsusp-1.x.x ? )
- Date: Thu Aug 28 11:22:01 2003
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 04:31:03PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> Hi ,
> i'm tring to incorporate the dev-mapper 1.00.04 in a kernel that already has
> int fls(int x)
> which conflicts with the definitions in dm-io.[ch]
There's a bug in that code anyway, I suspect that all of the fls/log2
stuff will be removed eventually.
> so i wanted to ask you whether the attached patch looks OK,
At a glance it looks ok, though it might be simpler if you just
renamed our ffs to dm_ffs. That way you'd have more confidence that
things works as they do now.
> i wanted also to ask whether there are some important fixes in the patches
> from Joe Thornber,
> which should be applied after device-mapper-1.00.04
My patchsets do have important fixes, but they are also less stable.
CVS gets updated with the patches that have proved themselves.
- Joe
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]