[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] trivial patch to dm-io.c
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm osdl org>
- To: Dave Olien <dmo osdl org>
- Cc: dm-devel redhat com, thornber redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] trivial patch to dm-io.c
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:57:35 -0700
Dave Olien <dmo osdl org> wrote:
>
> Here's trivial patches to dm-io.c. Just adds static declarations, and adds
> dm_io_sync_bvec() to the list of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions.
Speaking of trivia...
Could you please avoid using content-free subjects such as "trivial patch
to dm-io.c"? We know that it's a patch, and we can see what files it
touches.
Something like "dm-io.c: add static decls, export dm_io_sync_bvec()" would
be a more useful patch description.
It's better than "Updated CPU hotplug patches for IA64 [Patch 3/7]" though.
Probably a third of the patches I receive have useless summaries and I
have to cook up meaningful ones for them. Which is not a competely bad
thing but it is, on balance, best that the originator prepare the summary.
Make my life a little easier ;) Thanks.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]