[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: raid10 ... (was: Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 1.7.0)
- From: Mark Hahn <hahn physics mcmaster ca>
- To: Jure PeÃar <pegasus nerv eu org>
- Cc: linux-raid vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: raid10 ... (was: Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 1.7.0)
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:18:09 -0400 (EDT)
> Am i dreaming (it's well over 4am here :) ? Or is something like this
> possible? Maybe not with a md personality, but by some daemon that would be
> taking care of a dm map?
such things are available commercially; I can't say how well they work.
personally, I doubt that this kind of thing can be done well at a purely
block level - I think that some file-level information would be beneficial,
perhaps essential. but this is a layering-violating idea, and seems to
rub a lot of people the wrong way. on the other hand, there is a seperate
movement towards "object storage" systems, which is certainly a related idea.
regards, mark hahn.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]