[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] pathchecker
- From: Joe Thornber <thornber redhat com>
- To: dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] pathchecker
- Date: Tue Mar 2 03:56:01 2004
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:42:13PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> We don't 'miss' the event, no, but we still get the most current
> status, not the intermediate status, right?
yes, the status reflects the current status of the targets, not what
the events were.
- Joe
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]