Re: [dm-devel] Re: multipath tool priority group question

[Mike Christie <mikenc us ibm com>]

christophe varoqui free fr wrote:

> btw, if group_by_tur works for your HW, please add its strings to the policy
> selector array and send a patch.

Is the policy selector array the wlist? Are you sure you don't want to 
make this a text file. For reconfigurable devices like ours, I don't 
know what the sane default is.

> Selon christophe varoqui free fr:
>
>
> > You should use the group_by_tur policy.
> > It does what you describe.
> >
> > Selon Mike Christie <michaelc cs wisc edu>:
> >
> >
> > > Hi Christophe,
> > >
> > > For policy it states, "failover 1 path per priority group",
> > > but what if I want to put N paths in each group?
> > >
> > > I want to round-robin over N paths, and when they fail I want
> > > to start using a lower priority group. I have two cases. One
> > > where I have a set of paths that are imediately ready, and a
> > > second set that has to be activated first. And a second case
> > > where the second set is ready, but for any reason we want to use
> > > it as backup only.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Mike
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > --
> > dm-devel mailing list
> > dm-devel redhat com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel