[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: ATARAID/FakeRAID/HPTRAID/PDCRAID as dm targets?
- From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d hailfinger kernel 2004 gmx net>
- To: christophe varoqui <christophe varoqui free fr>
- Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B Zolnierkiewicz elka pw edu pl>, Device mapper devel list <dm-devel redhat com>, Christophe Saout <christophe saout de>, Arjan van de Ven <arjanv redhat com>, Thomas Horsten <thomas horsten com>, "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming backtobasicsmgmt com>, Wilfried Weissmann <Wilfried Weissmann gmx at>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik pobox com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel vger kernel org>, Neil Brown <neilb cse unsw edu au>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: ATARAID/FakeRAID/HPTRAID/PDCRAID as dm targets?
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:46:32 +0100
christophe varoqui wrote:
>>>>> - Would an EVMS plugin or a simple script calling dmsetup be the
>>>>> way to
>>>>> go? If I go the dmsetup route, is there any chance to get partition
>>>>> detection on top of the ATARAID for free (by calling another dm tool)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This was posted a while back; I don't know what the status of it being
>>>> merged into util-linux is.
>>>>
>>>> http://lwn.net/Articles/13958/
>>
>>
>> Christophe V.: What is the currrent status of your work?
>>
> It mutated into kpartx, as I ported the compilation to klibc.
> It is functionaly unchanged since that LWN report.
>
> I know it works for partitioned multipath devmaps, partitioned loops,
> partioned md ...
>
> It needs more testing and a lot of integration thinking.
Oh, you will get a lot of testing once I use kpartx to handle partitions
on top of ataraid. I'm aiming for a working solution at the end of this week.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]