[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: [dm-devel] kmalloc after down_write?
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- To: Kevin Corry <kevcorry us ibm com>
- Cc: dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [dm-devel] kmalloc after down_write?
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:59:43 +0000
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 02:51:00PM -0600, Kevin Corry wrote:
> Personally, I think this is one area where we really don't have to worry about
> lock contention.
Indeed it's well down the list. The main problem with snapshots
is the amount of kernel memory they require.
Alasdair
--
agk redhat com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]