[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH resubmit] do_mount: reduce stack consumption
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm osdl org>
- To: Neil Brown <neilb suse de>
- Cc: heiko carstens de ibm com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, bunk stusta de, dm-devel redhat com, aherrman de ibm com, cplk itee uq edu au
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH resubmit] do_mount: reduce stack consumption
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:37:06 -0800
Neil Brown <neilb suse de> wrote:
>
> ...
> Reduce stack usage with stacked block devices
>
> ...
> diff ./include/linux/sched.h~current~ ./include/linux/sched.h
> --- ./include/linux/sched.h~current~ 2005-11-07 10:01:36.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./include/linux/sched.h 2005-11-07 10:02:23.000000000 +1100
> @@ -829,6 +829,9 @@ struct task_struct {
> /* journalling filesystem info */
> void *journal_info;
>
> +/* stacked block device info */
> + struct bio *bio_list, **bio_tail;
> +
> /* VM state */
> struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state;
>
More state in the task_strut is a bit sad, but not nearly as sad as deep
recursion in our deepest codepath..
Possibly one could do:
struct make_request_state {
struct bio *bio_list;
struct bio **bio_tail;
};
and stick a `struct make_request_state *' into the task_struct and actually
allocate the thing on the stack. That's not much nicer though.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]