[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: RFC: dm patches for 2.6.16
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- To: Adrian Bunk <bunk stusta de>
- Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>, Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux rere qmqm pl>, dm-devel redhat com, Daniel Kobras <kobras linux de>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: RFC: dm patches for 2.6.16
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:25:59 +0000
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:24:44AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The following attached patches seem to make sense for 2.6.16:
>
> Added in 2.6.17.11 and 2.6.18:
> dm: BUG/OOPS fix
>
> Added in 2.6.17.12 and 2.6.18:
> dm snapshot: unify chunk_size
> dm: add module ref counting
> dm: mirror sector offset fix
> dm: Fix deadlock under high i/o load in raid1 setup.
>
> Added in 2.6.19:
> dm snapshot: fix metadata writing when suspending
>
> Do these patches look OK for 2.6.16,
Yes.
> Are there any critical patches I missed?
The general rule for patches I send to linux-kernel is that any patch with
'fix' in the title is a candidate for stable trees (together with any
earlier patches they depend upon).
Alasdair
--
agk redhat com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]