[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- To: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura ce jp nec com>
- Cc: Mike Anderson <andmike us ibm com>, Greg KH <gregkh suse de>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb suse de>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:13:05 +0000
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> > This patch needs splitting up so that independent changes can be
> > considered separately.
> > c.f. The proposal from Mike Anderson (repeated below) which I prefer
> > because it makes it clear that a table always belongs to exactly one md.
> I like his proposed patch.
> The interface is useful for my purpose too and moving table
> creation inside _hash_lock means I don't need dm_get() neither.
The global _hash_lock should not be held (thereby locking out most dm ioctl
operations on any device) while the slow populate_table() runs.
I'm trying out a variant of the patch that drops and reacquires that lock.
Alasdair
--
agk redhat com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]