[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] dm-multipath [PATCH] "better" return codes.
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins redhat com>
- To: dm-devel redhat com
- Subject: [dm-devel] dm-multipath [PATCH] "better" return codes.
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:11:10 -0600
I think that these multipathd return codes make more sense (failing if the map
is not a multipath map, and not failing if it has already been added).
-Ben
diff -urpN mp-devel-clean/multipathd/main.c mp-devel-patched/multipathd/main.c
--- mp-devel-clean/multipathd/main.c 2006-02-27 15:09:55.000000000 -0600
+++ mp-devel-patched/multipathd/main.c 2006-02-27 15:16:13.000000000 -0600
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ ev_add_map (char * devname, struct vecto
if (map_present && dm_type(alias, DEFAULT_TARGET) <= 0) {
condlog(4, "%s: not a multipath map", alias);
FREE(alias);
- return 0;
+ return 1;
}
mpp = find_mp_by_alias(vecs->mpvec, alias);
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ ev_add_path (char * devname, struct vect
/*
* allow reconfig of orphaned path here
*/
- if (pp->mpp) return 1;
+ if (pp->mpp) return 0;
}
else {
/*
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]