[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: [dm-devel] patch to discovery.c to still get path priority forpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN
- From: Edward Goggin <egoggin emc com>
- To: <dm-devel redhat com>
- Cc: christophe varoqui free fr
- Subject: RE: [dm-devel] patch to discovery.c to still get path priority forpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:47:35 -0500
Dave,
Sorry for the confusion.
I realize that at first glance the patch may not make sense, but it
is an attempt to avoid the case of not being able to properly assign
path groups with a group_by_priority path grouping policy if any of
the paths respond successfully to scsi_id(8) and mpath_prio_* but not
their multipath path checker. Such is the case for LUNZ and inactive
snapshot logical units on CLARiiON.
Ed
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dm-devel-bounces redhat com
> [mailto:dm-devel-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Dave Wysochanski
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 3:05 PM
> To: device-mapper development
> Cc: christophe varoqui free fr
> Subject: Re: [dm-devel] patch to discovery.c to still get
> path priority forpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN
>
> Ed, I am looking through your patches and in particular this change,
> which reverts a previous change I submitted a little while back.
>
> Maybe we can do something better like clarify states. Looking through
> the code now and will have more feedback.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 18:01 -0500, Edward Goggin wrote:
> > --
> > dm-devel mailing list
> > dm-devel redhat com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]