[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Add userspace device-mapper target



From: Dan Smith <danms us ibm com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Add userspace device-mapper target
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:16:29 -0800

> I've got a hacked-up version running that allows userspace to provide
> a pointer to a buffer to be written after the original bio completes.

Great.


> This seems to work pretty well, but I haven't added support to the
> library or my cow application, so I'm not sure how the performance
> differs.
> 
> There is something that needs to be resolved, however.  Currently,
> bio_map_user() assumes it is being run in process context.  Since we
> defer to a kthread for all ring buffer processing, we can't easily
> construct the extra bios.  So, there are two paths forward that I can
> think of:
> 
> 1. Redesign how we process messages going to the kernel.  Userspace
>    could mark them as "tentatively ready" and then do the write()
>    which just goes through and constructs extra bios and marks them
>    "ready".  This seems undesirable to me, because we're increasing
>    the amount of time that userspace is blocked in the kernel.

Yeah, it's not the best way for the performance perspective. But your
original code used this logic, didn't it? I guess that the code
doesn't give notable performance difference even if dmu_ctl_write
checks new requests and calls bio_map_user if necessary.


> 2. Add a bio_map_user_from() call to the kernel, which behaves just
>    like bio_map_user(), but takes a struct task struct pointer to the
>    process to map from, thus allowing the kthread to construct the
>    bios asynchronously.  I have a patch cooked up to do this, but I'm
>    worried that it might be rather controversial.

This path isn't easy,


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]