On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:00:59 PDT, Mike Anderson said: > No, all admin tools and interfaces function as they do today. The > dm-netlink patch series only contains 9 deletions (actual just one true > deletion of existing kernel code the others are due to break up of the > patch into compilable chunks). The intent was not to break users or force > migration. OK, I'll bite - if the admin tools function as before, who is *using* the code? Or do the admin tools have a preferred netlink component and a fallback set of code if that fails?
Description: PGP signature