[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] block: factor out bio_check_eod()
- From: Jens Axboe <jens axboe oracle com>
- To: Tejun Heo <htejun gmail com>
- Cc: David Chinner <dgc sgi com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, linux-raid vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, Phillip Susi <psusi cfl rr com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger clusterfs com>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] block: factor out bio_check_eod()
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:34:50 +0200
On Wed, Jul 18 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 18 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>>> End of device check is done twice in __generic_make_request() and it's
> >>>> fully inlined each time. Factor out bio_check_eod().
> >>> Tejun, yeah I should seperate the cleanups and put them in the upstream
> >>> branch. Will do so and add your signed-off to both of them.
> >>>
> >> Would they be different from the one I just posted? No big deal either
> >> way. I'm just basing the zero-length barrier on top of these patches.
> >> Oh well, the changes are trivial anyway.
> >
> > This one ended up being the same, but in the first one you missed some
> > of the cleanups. I ended up splitting the patch some more though, see
> > the series:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=shortlog;h=barrier
>
> Alright, will base on 662d5c5e6afb79d05db5563205b809c0de530286. Thanks.
1781c6a39fb6e31836557618c4505f5f7bc61605, no? Unless you want to rewrite
it completely :-)
--
Jens Axboe
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]