RE: [dm-devel] Question about dmevents

["Wood, Brian J" <brian j wood intel com>]

Hi Alasdair, I also read in the definition of DM_DEV_CREATE that the
uuid is optional. Since that is the case shouldn't the failure for not
having a uuid in "_alloc_thread_status()" be taken out?

Thank you, 

Brian Wood
Intel Corporation 
Digital Enterprise Group
Manageability & Platform Software Division
brian j wood intel com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dm-devel-bounces redhat com [mailto:dm-devel-bounces redhat com]
On
>Behalf Of Alasdair G Kergon
>Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:26 AM
>To: device-mapper development
>Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Question about dmevents
>
>See http://people.redhat.com/agk/talks/FOSDEM_2005/text41.html for info
>about
>how devices are referenced.
>
>Alasdair
>--
>agk redhat com
>
>--
>dm-devel mailing list
>dm-devel redhat com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel