[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [patch 1/3] Extremely basic hp hardware handler (no retries, no error handling, etc).
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan us ibm com>
- To: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha redhat com>
- Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [patch 1/3] Extremely basic hp hardware handler (no retries, no error handling, etc).
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:05:20 -0700
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 16:10 -0400, Dave Wysochanski wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 12:25 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > Do you want to keep the DMDEBUG in this patch ?
> >
> > Other than that it looks good...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
> Unless there are objections I'd keep it.
No, I don't have any objections. Just wanted to make sure that you
intend to have it that way (as you have mentioned in the other patch you
are getting rid of DMDEBUG.
chandra
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan us ibm com | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- [dm-devel] [patch 0/3] Add HP hardware handler support to dm-multipath
- [dm-devel] [patch 1/3] Extremely basic hp hardware handler (no retries, no error handling, etc).
- Re: [dm-devel] [patch 1/3] Extremely basic hp hardware handler (no retries, no error handling, etc).
- From: Chandra Seetharaman
- Re: [dm-devel] [patch 1/3] Extremely basic hp hardware handler (no retries, no error handling, etc).
- Re: [dm-devel] [patch 1/3] Extremely basic hp hardware handler (no retries, no error handling, etc).
- From: Chandra Seetharaman
- Re: [dm-devel] [patch 1/3] Extremely basic hp hardware handler (no retries, no error handling, etc).
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]