[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [2.6.22 PATCH 22/26] dm: bio list helpers
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh linux01 gwdg de>
- To: Jens Axboe <jens axboe oracle com>
- Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm linux-foundation org>, Heinz Mauelshagen <hjm redhat com>, dm-devel redhat com, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [2.6.22 PATCH 22/26] dm: bio list helpers
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:17:57 +0200 (MEST)
On May 9 2007 08:49, Jens Axboe wrote:
>On Tue, May 08 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > +#define bio_list_for_each(bio, bl) \
>> > + for (bio = (bl)->head; bio && ({ prefetch(bio->bi_next); 1; }); \
>> > + bio = bio->bi_next)
>> > +
>
>Besides, manual prefetching is very rarely a win. I dabbled with some
>benchmarks a few weeks back (with the doubly linked lists), and in most
>cases it was actually a loss. So I'd vote for just removing the
>prefetch() above.
So is the prefetching in the basic ADTs (e.g. linux/list.h) a loss too?
Jan
--
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]