[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] failover vs multibus
- From: "Scott Moseman" <scmoseman gmail com>
- To: "device-mapper development" <dm-devel redhat com>
- Subject: [dm-devel] failover vs multibus
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:19:06 -0600
Re: default_path_grouping_policy in multipath.conf
failover = 1 path per priority group
multibus = all valid paths in 1 priority group
Does this mean that if I'm using failover I'm not going to get
multiple path throughput? And, on the flip side, if I'm sending data
through multiple paths I'm not going to get failover support?
Obviously I want to have both (or all) channels sending traffic, but
still being able to failover in the event I lose a path. Maybe this
means my multipath.conf is going to get more complex than the standard
configuration sample?
Thanks,
Scott
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]