[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>
- To: Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:56:24 +0100
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:52:29PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> Akinobu Mita wrote:
> > 2007/9/24, Akinobu Mita <akinobu mita gmail com>:
> >> freeze_bdev() does not return errno as pointer on failure.
> >> This patch fixes the return value check.
> >
> ...
> > But there is no reason to check the return value with IS_ERR().
> > Because freeze_bdev return NULL or valid super block
>
> Yes, but there is another place in kernel using this check
> (see /fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c)
>
> Probably question for Christoph Hellwig - some changes related to
> returning error in frezze_bdev() were planned but never commited.
> (see list archive)
>
> Otherwise test for IS_ERR() should be removed.
The plan was to change freeze_bdev to do a trylock un s_umount_sem
and return SBUSY if it fails to avoid the deadlock scenario where
people called xfs_freeze and got another freeze request from dm.
I don't remember why this never got it, it's probably worth sending
a patch like this again.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]