[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: Too many I/O controller patches
- From: Balbir Singh <balbir linux vnet ibm com>
- To: Dave Hansen <dave linux vnet ibm com>
- Cc: xen-devel lists xensource com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, virtualization lists linux-foundation org, dm-devel redhat com, agk sourceware org, Andrea Righi <righi andrea gmail com>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: Too many I/O controller patches
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:36:11 -0000
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 17:51 +0900, Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
>> This series of patches of dm-ioband now includes "The bio tracking mechanism,"
>> which has been posted individually to this mailing list.
>> This makes it easy for anybody to control the I/O bandwidth even when
>> the I/O is one of delayed-write requests.
>
> During the Containers mini-summit at OLS, it was mentioned that there
> are at least *FOUR* of these I/O controllers floating around. Have you
> talked to the other authors? (I've cc'd at least one of them).
>
> We obviously can't come to any kind of real consensus with people just
> tossing the same patches back and forth.
Ryo and Andrea - Naveen and Satoshi met up at OLS and discussed their approach.
It would be really nice to see an RFC, I know Andrea did work on this and
compared the approaches.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]