[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: RFC: I/O bandwidth controller
- From: Dave Hansen <dave linux vnet ibm com>
- To: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando oss ntt co jp>
- Cc: xen-devel lists xensource com, uchida ap jp nec com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, virtualization lists linux-foundation org, dm-devel redhat com, agk sourceware org, ngupta google com, righi andrea gmail com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: RFC: I/O bandwidth controller
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:48:33 -0000
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:41 +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> > I agree with your plan.
> > We keep bio-cgroup improving and porting to the latest kernel.
> Having more users of bio-cgroup would probably help to get it merged, so
> we'll certainly send patches as soon as we get our cfq prototype in
> shape.
I'm confused. Are these two of the competing controllers? Or are the
complementary in some way?
-- Dave
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]