[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 6/7] bio-cgroup: Implement the bio-cgroup
- From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa takuya oss ntt co jp>
- To: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov valinux co jp>
- Cc: xen-devel lists xensource com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, virtualization lists linux-foundation org, dm-devel redhat com, agk sourceware org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 6/7] bio-cgroup: Implement the bio-cgroup
- Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:09:49 -0000
Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
+static void bio_cgroup_move_task(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
+ struct cgroup *cont,
+ struct cgroup *old_cont,
+ struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *mm;
+ struct bio_cgroup *biog, *old_biog;
+
+ if (bio_cgroup_disabled())
+ return;
+
+ mm = get_task_mm(p);
+ if (mm == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ biog = cgroup_bio(cont);
+ old_biog = cgroup_bio(old_cont);
+
+ mmput(mm);
+ return;
+}
Is this function fully implemented?
I tried to put a process into a group by writing to
"/cgroup/bio/BGROUP/tasks" but failed.
I think this function is not enough to be used as "attach."
+
+
+struct cgroup_subsys bio_cgroup_subsys = {
+ .name = "bio",
+ .subsys_id = bio_cgroup_subsys_id,
+ .create = bio_cgroup_create,
+ .destroy = bio_cgroup_destroy,
+ .pre_destroy = bio_cgroup_pre_destroy,
+ .populate = bio_cgroup_populate,
+ .attach = bio_cgroup_move_task,
+ .early_init = 0,
+};
Without "attach" function, it is difficult to check
the effectiveness of block I/O tracking.
Thanks,
- Takuya Yoshikawa
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]