[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [patch] leastpending_io load balancing policy
- From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda ct jp nec com>
- To: "Balasubramanian, Vijayakumar (STSD)" <vijayakumar hp com>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [patch] leastpending_io load balancing policy
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:43:21 +0900
Hi Alasdair, Vijayakumar,
Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> Also look at request based multipath patch rqdm-dlb-02-queue-length-dlb.patch
> which addresses some but not all of those points.
FYI.
The rqdm-dlb-* patches don't depend on request-based dm-multipath,
so those can work on bio-based dm-multipath, too, with some cosmetic
changes.
Alasdair,
If you want to apply dynamic load balancer patches before request-based
dm-multipath patches, I can rebase my load balancer patches.
The reason why I've been posting those patches on top of request-based
patches is that load balancer doesn't work well in bio-based dm-multipath.
Bio-based dm-multipath is on top of the I/O scheduler, so I/O merging and
I/O sorting may occur after path switching.
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]