[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/4] dm-log: support multi-log devices
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow redhat com>
- To: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/4] dm-log: support multi-log devices
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:21:01 -0600
On Nov 25, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Takahiro Yasui wrote:
PATCH SET
=========
1/4: dm-log: fix no io_client_destroy
definitely, ACK.
2/4: dm-log: remove unnecessary updates of io_req members
haven't fully reviewed yet.
3/4: dm-log: introduce multi-log devices
4/4: dm-log: update interface to control multi-log devices
No. more follows...
BACKGROUND
==========
<snip>
However, once log disk breaks down, data replications are required
for a whole data disks, and if a size of data disk is huge, it
takes long time
Not entirely true. When the log disk breaks down /and/ the machine
crashes or reboots, then resynchronization is necessary. However,
this means that in almost all circumstances, you are immediately able
to replace the failed disk log with another and maintain the in-sync
state of the log - avoiding the resync.
This patch introduces multi-log devices for mirror target, which
stores log data on multiple log devices, and decreases probability
of disk replication even if one log disk has broken down.
Given what I said above, I'd like to see intelligence added to the
dmeventd mirror DSO to handle replacing mirror logs done first. There
is certainly a lot of low lying fruit in that space. However, I can
see a small benefit to implementing multi-log. Specifically, to
address the case where a log device dies and is immediately followed
by a machine failure before corrective action can be taken. IOW, you
are targeting a very small window of time here.
If you choose to take on the multi-log (which it appears you are
mostly done), then I'd like to see it as a separate module. IOW,
there should be no code changes to dm-log.c. You would implement a
new module, named dm-log-multi[ple].ko. The name would be "multi-
disk". This frees you to have whatever constructor table arguments
you want. (I've done something similar when creating my cluster-aware
logging.)
I'll be on the call on Monday, of course you can ask any questions
then too.
brassow
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]