[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 7/9] scsi_dh: Add support for SDEV_PASSIVE
- From: James Bottomley <James Bottomley HansenPartnership com>
- To: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan us ibm com>
- Cc: andmike us ibm com, dm-devel redhat com, michaelc cs wisc edu, linux-scsi vger kernel org, jens axboe oracle com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 7/9] scsi_dh: Add support for SDEV_PASSIVE
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:58:18 -0600
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:32 -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> Subject: scsi_dh: Add support for SDEV_PASSIVE
>
> From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan us ibm com>
>
> This patch adds a new device state SDEV_PASSIVE, to correspond to the
> passive side access of an active/passive multipathed device.
Really, no; this isn't right. The state field of a SCSI device is for
the SCSI state model. Passive might be a valid device mapper state, but
it's not a valid SCSI state. If these patches can't work except by
mucking with the SCSI state model, there's some layering problem
elsewhere that needs sorting out.
James
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]