[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- To: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, Michael Tokarev <mjt tls msk ru>, Andi Kleen <andi firstfloor org>, linux-kernel vger kernel org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:12:29 +0000
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:20:10PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:07:54PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > I wonder if it's worth the effort to try to implement this.
My personal view (which seems to be in the minority) is that it's a
waste of our development time *except* in the (rare?) cases similar to
the ones Andi is talking about.
But the decision has already been made for us in the block layer:
dm is now pretty much required to support (zero-length) barriers.
Unfortunately we didn't get this finished in time for 2.6.25, but we
intend to get it done for 2.6.26: Woe betide any callers today that
don't handle EOPNOTSUPP!
Alasdair
--
agk redhat com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]