[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan infradead org>
- To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos szeredi hu>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, t-sato yk jp nec com, tytso mit edu, mtk manpages googlemail com, miklos szeredi hu, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, xfs oss sgi com, hch infradead org, pavel suse cz, viro ZenIV linux org uk, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, akpm linux-foundation org, linux-ext4 vger kernel org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:41:20 -0700
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:22:56 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos szeredi hu> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > This would mean that freeze and thaw will have to be done on the
> > > same file descriptor, but this isn't unreasonable to expect, is
> > > it?
> >
> > It is certainly not the current use case, where you run one command
> > to freeze the filesystem and another one to unfreeze it.
>
> So instead of
>
> freeze_fs mountpoint
> backup-command
> unfreeze_fs mountpoint
>
> the user would have do to
>
> run_freezed mountpoint backup-command
>
> I find the second one nicer, regardless of any reliability issues.
nah he needs to do
make_snapshot ; backup-command ; unref_snapshot.
freezing isn't the right solution for the backup problem ;)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan linux intel com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]