[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan infradead org>
- To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos szeredi hu>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, t-sato yk jp nec com, tytso mit edu, mtk manpages googlemail com, miklos szeredi hu, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, xfs oss sgi com, hch infradead org, pavel suse cz, viro ZenIV linux org uk, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, akpm linux-foundation org, linux-ext4 vger kernel org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:55:02 -0700
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:48:42 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos szeredi hu> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > nah he needs to do
> >
> > make_snapshot ; backup-command ; unref_snapshot.
> >
> > freezing isn't the right solution for the backup problem ;)
>
> Confused, what's freezing _is_ for then? Patch description says:
>
> Currently, ext3 in mainline Linux doesn't have the freeze feature
> which suspends write requests. So, we cannot take a backup which
> keeps the filesystem's consistency with the storage device's features
> (snapshot and replication) while it is mounted.
I tihnk the idea there is
freeze . do the snapshot op . unfreeze . make backup of snapshot
one can argue about the need of doing the first 3 steps via a userland
loop; it sure sounds like one needs to be really careful to not do any
writes to the fs from the app that does snapshots (and that includes
doing any syscalls in the kernel that allocate memory.. just because
that already could cause unrelated data to be written from inside the
app. Not fun.)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan linux intel com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]