[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan infradead org>
- To: Olaf Frączyk <olaf cbk poznan pl>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, t-sato yk jp nec com, Theodore Tso <tytso mit edu>, mtk manpages googlemail com, Miklos Szeredi <miklos szeredi hu>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, xfs oss sgi com, hch infradead org, pavel suse cz, viro ZenIV linux org uk, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, akpm linux-foundation org, linux-ext4 vger kernel org
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:57:58 -0700
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:59:20 +0200
Olaf Frączyk <olaf cbk poznan pl> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 08:24 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 09:49:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > (e) none of the above. The kernel compilation will appear to
> > > pause until the filesystem is unfrozen. No other visible effect
> > > should occur. It will get blocked in a write or filesystem
> > > transaction because the fs is frozen.
> >
> > So if the process which froze the filesystem accidentally tries
> > writing to a log file (or database file containing the backup
> > information, or whatever) that happens to be on the filesystem that
> > is frozen, that process will get blocked and you end up in a
> > deadlock; did I get that right?
> Where do you see the deadlock?
> The process doesn't have a lock on filesystem or something. You can
> always unfreeze from another process.
>
if it's one of your main filesystems... good luck starting a shell
without writing a single thing to disk... FAIL.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]