[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] Re: Round Robin vs Active/Passive
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare suse de>
- To: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: Round Robin vs Active/Passive
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:20:31 +0200
Hi Tore,
Tore Anderson wrote:
[ .. ]
What I need to do is this:
# My new CX3-40f which supports ALUA (preferred) as well as PNR
device {
vendor DGC
product *
product_blacklist LUNZ
alua_capable yes
[..ALUA optimised settings...]
}
# My old CX200, only supports PNR
device {
vendor DGC
product *
product_blacklist LUNZ
alua_capable no
[..PNR optimised settings...]
}
...but there's no such thing as the "alua_capable" setting or any other
setting that can be used to distinguish between the two CLARiiONs, as
far as I know, so I have to use both arrays in PNR mode even though the
newest one of them supports ALUA.
No need. I did some patch once ago which allowed you to set the hardware
handler in the multipaths section.
For exactly this scenario. Can you test if it works?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare suse de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]