[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] block: add rq->complete_io hook for request stacking
- From: "Grant Grundler" <grundler google com>
- To: "Hannes Reinecke" <hare suse de>
- Cc: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda ct jp nec com>, linux-scsi vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, jens axboe oracle com, j-nomura ce jp nec com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] block: add rq->complete_io hook for request stacking
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:33:15 -0800
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Hannes Reinecke <hare suse de> wrote:
> I would rather have rq->complete_io() to be pointing to blk_end_io in the
> default case, this way rq->complete_io() would always be valid and we
> would be saving us the if() clause.
This is a good idea. But...
...
> So when using my proposal this would just become:
>
> {
> BUG_ON(!rq->complete_io);
>
> return rq->complete_io(rq, error, nr_bytes, 0, NULL);
> }
This "BUG_ON" is also an "if()" clause except
it will panic. The box will panic if the function
pointer is a null pointer and it won't be hard to
sort out why. I suggest omitting the BUG_ON.
thanks,
grant
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]