[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer gmail com>
- To: "device-mapper development" <dm-devel redhat com>, agk redhat com, "Ric Wheeler" <ric emc com>, "Michael Tokarev" <mjt tls msk ru>, "Andi Kleen" <andi firstfloor org>, linux-kernel vger kernel org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:55:30 -0400
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:52:10AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> > I understand that. Most of the time, dm or md devices are composed of
> > uniform components which will uniformly support (or not) the cache flush
> > commands used by barriers.
>
> As a dm developer, it's "almost none of the time" because trivial
> configurations aren't the ones that require lots of testing effort.
>
> Let's stop arguing over "most of the time":-)
>
> As Andi points out, there are certainly enough real-world users of
> "single linear or crypt target using one physical device" for it to be
> worth our supporting it.
Hi Alasdair,
Given that you feel supporting barriers on single device DM targets is
a good thing, what is the status of such support (like Andi's patch)
making it upstream?
Mike
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]