[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[dm-devel] RFC: Patch to dm-raid1 to allow error type in status output - even when !errors_handled



I have not compiled or tested this patch at this point... just looking
for feedback.

 brassow

Device-mapper mirrors are allowed to either handle or ignore
device errors/failures.  In some cases, it is desirable to
ignore errors.  For example, when using 'pvmove' to move data
off of a failing device, we just want to get all the data we
can and not stop for failures.

Currently, when failures are ignored, they are completely ignored.
They are not recorded and have no affect on the mirror.  I think
it would be more beneficial to at least record the information -
even though no action is taken.  This way, the status output could
indicate that a problem occurred.  Since the status output is
backwards compatible with older programs, those older programs
would simply ignore the new information.  Newer or updated programs,
on the other hand, would be able to see that something had happened
- even if they didn't want to take action.  (Imagine copying off
data from a failing drive.  You may want to copy all that you can
without stopping for failures, but you still want to know if some
regions didn't get copied properly.)

The way to do this is to move the 'errors_handled' check after the
error accounting in fail_mirror (but before action is taken to
change the primary mirror, etc.).  The error accounting is done by
incrementing 'error_count' and setting 'error_type'.  Since these
variables can now have non-zero value, even when not handling
errors, we must couple a check for 'errors_handled' in the places
where 'error_count' is checked - specifically, 'choose_mirror',
'default_ok', and 'do_reads'.

We handle 'choose_mirror' a little bit more cleverly than just
mitigating the 'error_count' with a check for 'errors_handled'.
In this case, if the region is in sync, we still try to find
a mirror that has not failed (just in case we would read stale
data); but if there is no other option, we can still give the
default mirror if we are ignoring errors.


Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c
@@ -197,9 +197,6 @@ static void fail_mirror(struct mirror *m
 	struct mirror_set *ms = m->ms;
 	struct mirror *new;
 
-	if (!errors_handled(ms))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * error_count is used for nothing more than a
 	 * simple way to tell if a device has encountered
@@ -210,6 +207,9 @@ static void fail_mirror(struct mirror *m
 	if (test_and_set_bit(error_type, &m->error_type))
 		return;
 
+	if (!errors_handled(ms))
+		return;
+
 	if (m != get_default_mirror(ms))
 		goto out;
 
@@ -369,14 +369,15 @@ static struct mirror *choose_mirror(stru
 			m += ms->nr_mirrors;
 	} while (m != get_default_mirror(ms));
 
-	return NULL;
+	return (errors_handled(ms)) ? NULL : m;
 }
 
 static int default_ok(struct mirror *m)
 {
 	struct mirror *default_mirror = get_default_mirror(m->ms);
 
-	return !atomic_read(&default_mirror->error_count);
+	return !errors_handled(m->ms) ||
+		!atomic_read(&default_mirror->error_count);
 }
 
 static int mirror_available(struct mirror_set *ms, struct bio *bio)
@@ -483,7 +484,8 @@ static void do_reads(struct mirror_set *
 		 */
 		if (likely(region_in_sync(ms, region, 1)))
 			m = choose_mirror(ms, bio->bi_sector);
-		else if (m && atomic_read(&m->error_count))
+		else if (m && errors_handled(ms) &&
+			 atomic_read(&m->error_count))
 			m = NULL;
 
 		if (likely(m))



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]