[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix dm_any_congested() to properly sync up with suspend code path)
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com>
- To: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, dm-devel <dm-devel redhat com>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org
- Subject: Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix dm_any_congested() to properly sync up with suspend code path)
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:19:21 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:11:51AM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > For upstream Linux developers: you are holding a spinlock and calling
> > bdi*_congested functions that can take indefinite amount of time (there
> > are even users reporting having 50 disks in one logical volume or so). I
> > think it would be good to move these calls out of spinlocks.
>
> Umm, they shouldn't block that long, as that completely defeats their
> purpose. These functions are mostly used to avoid throwing more I/O at
> a congested device if pdflush could do more useful things instead. But
> if it blocks in those functions anyway we wouldn't have to bother using
> them. Do you have more details about the uses cases when this happens
> and where the routines spend so much time?
For device mapper, congested_fn asks every device in the tree and make OR
of their bits --- so if the user has 50 devices, it asks them all.
For md-linear, md-raid0, md-raid1, md-raid10 and md-multipath it does the
same --- asking every device.
If you have a better idea how to implement congested_fn, say it.
Mikulas
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]