[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix dm_any_congested() to properly sync up with suspend code path)
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com>
- To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz infradead org>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, linux-kernel vger kernel org, Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, dm-devel <dm-devel redhat com>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix dm_any_congested() to properly sync up with suspend code path)
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:55:55 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > If you have a physical disk that has many LVM volumes on it, you end up in
> > a situation when disk congestion state change is reported to all the
> > volumes. So it will create O(n) problem at the other side.
>
> *sigh* I can almost understand why people want to use lvm to combine
> multiple disks, but why make the partition thing even worse...
To protect the services from each other --- so that mail storm won't blow
user's directories, users blowing their space can't corrupt the system
updates, logs are kept safely even if other partition overflows etc.
I just know some admins who prefer to have separate filesystems instead of
quotas for this purpose.
Mikulas
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]