[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [Question] power management related with cgroup based resource management
- From: "Paul Menage" <menage google com>
- To: "Dong-Jae Kang" <baramsori72 gmail com>
- Cc: corsetproject googlegroups com, xen-devel lists xensource com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, virtualization lists linux-foundation org, dm-devel redhat com, Matthew Garrett <mjg redhat com>, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy linux vnet ibm com>, balbir linux vnet ibm com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [Question] power management related with cgroup based resource management
- Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:43:53 -0700
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Dong-Jae Kang <baramsori72 gmail com> wrote:
> Thank you for your positive opinion about my question
>
> I also hope cgroup framework has good point related with power management
> I think I need more re-consideration for it. ^^
>
> How do you think about cgroup based management of new HW devices, for
> example, SSD, NVRAM and so on.
> Is there any requirement for it ?
> and is there any required work for it?
> I didn't seriously consider about that until now.^^ so I don't have cool idea
> but, I think it is worthy to find new domain to be applied by existing
> technology
Control Groups is just a framework for associating state with
(user-created) groups of processes. So if you have a problem to solve
that involves tracking state for different processes, or applying
different behaviour to groups of processes based on that group's
state, then cgroups may well be an appropriate tool.
In the case you mention (management of new devices) that's already
somewhat covered by the existing device isolation subsystem - you can
create a cgroup that has (or doesn't have) access to particular HW
devices.
Paul
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]