[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Add gfp_mask to bio_integrity_clone()
- From: Jens Axboe <jens axboe oracle com>
- To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin petersen oracle com>
- Cc: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda ct jp nec com>, device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Add gfp_mask to bio_integrity_clone()
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:17:02 +0100
On Fri, Oct 31 2008, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Jun'ichi" == Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura ce jp nec com> writes:
>
> Jun'ichi> What do you think about adding gfp_mask parameter to
> Jun'ichi> bio_integrity_clone() like the attached patch?
>
> Jun'ichi> It also seems natural to inherit gfp_mask from bio_clone
> Jun'ichi> when bio_integrity_clone is called from it. Since
> Jun'ichi> bio_clone() is the only caller of bio_integrity_clone() in
> Jun'ichi> 2.6.28-rc2 and all in-tree callers of bio_clone() are using
> Jun'ichi> GFP_NOIO, the patch does nothing other than changing the
> Jun'ichi> interface.
>
> Looks good to me. I'll update the non-multipath DM bits accordingly.
>
> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin petersen oracle com>
Shall I just include this in the 2.6.29 branch?
--
Jens Axboe
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]