[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: dm-ioband + bio-cgroup benchmarks
- From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa takuya oss ntt co jp>
- To: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov valinux co jp>
- Cc: xen-devel lists xensource com, containers lists linux-foundation org, linux-kernel vger kernel org, virtualization lists linux-foundation org, dm-devel redhat com, agk sourceware org, xemul openvz org, fernando oss ntt co jp, kamezawa hiroyu jp fujitsu com, balbir linux vnet ibm com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: dm-ioband + bio-cgroup benchmarks
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:49:24 +0900
Hi Tsuruta-san,
Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
Hi All,
I have got excellent results of dm-ioband, that controls the disk I/O
bandwidth even when it accepts delayed write requests.
In this time, I ran some benchmarks with a high-end storage. The
reason was to avoid a performance bottleneck due to mechanical factors
such as seek time.
You can see the details of the benchmarks at:
http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/hps/
I took a look at your beautiful results!
When you have time, would you explain me how you succeeded to check the
time, bandwidth, especially when you did write() tests? Actually, I tried
similar tests and failed to check the bandwidth correctly. Did you insert
something in the kernel source?
Thanks,
Takuya Yoshikawa
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]