[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>
- To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen sandeen net>
- Cc: axboe kernel dk, Takashi Sato <t-sato yk jp nec com>, mtk manpages googlemail com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, xfs oss sgi com, Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, dm-devel redhat com, viro ZenIV linux org uk, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, Andrew Morton <akpm linux-foundation org>, linux-ext4 vger kernel org, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler redhat com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg tv-sign ru>
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:37:49 -0400
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:36:04AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 05:52:35PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
> >> I think that your concern is that the freezer cannot recognize the occurrence
> >> of a timeout and it continues the backup process and the backup data is
> >> corrupted finally.
> >
> > What timeout should happen? the freeze ioctl must not return until the
> > filesystem is a clean state and all writes are blocked.
>
> The suggestion was that *UN*freeze would return ETIMEDOUT if the
> filesystem had already unfrozen itself, I think. That way you know that
> the snapshot you just took is worthless, at least.
But why would the filesystem every unfreeze itself? That defeats the
whole point of freezing it.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]