[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] I/O error during controller reboot
- From: "Chauhan, Vijay" <Vijay Chauhan lsi com>
- To: James Bottomley <James Bottomley HansenPartnership com>, "'sekharan us ibm com'" <sekharan us ibm com>
- Cc: "'dm-devel redhat com'" <dm-devel redhat com>, "linux-scsi vger kernel org" <linux-scsi vger kernel org>
- Subject: [dm-devel] I/O error during controller reboot
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:15:36 +0530
James,
I am having issue with scsi_io_completion routine. During device discovery, READ CAPACITY is failing with 02/04/01. It has been retried 5 times(with NEED_RETRY) but when retry gets exhausted ,scsi_io_completion simply ends the request without doing any delay retry as mentioned by you in below mail.
scsi_io_completion routine checks for deferred sense and if not found, it sets error with -EIO, which eventually ends the request and doesnot allow for any more retries. I am seeing deffered error being checked only for REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC command type. Does it meant that command with cmd_type REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC having current error sense should not be retried in scsi_io_completion? If yes, then would it be better to retry in rdac device handler in that case.
On Tues, 2009-03-10 at 15:47, James Bottomley wrote:
> > + if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04 && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x01)
> > + /* LUN Not Ready - Logical Unit Not
> Ready and is in
> > + * the process of becoming ready
> > + * Just retry.
> > + */
> > + return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
> > + if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04 && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x04)
> > + /* LUN Not Ready - Format In Progress
> > + *
> > + * Just retry.
> > + */
> > + return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
> > + if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04 && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x07)
> > + /* LUN Not Ready - Storage controller
> cannot respond
> > + * immediately to a PRIN or PROUT command.
> > + * Just retry.
> > + */
> > + return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
>
> For all of these ... along with a few other not ready types,
> we already
> do a delayed retry at the mid-layer (in scsi_io_completion). Is there
> some problem that causes this to need to be handled here as well?
Thanks,
Vijay
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]