[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[dm-devel] Re: dm-ioband: Test results.
- From: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov valinux co jp>
- To: agk redhat com
- Cc: snitzer redhat com, fernando oss ntt co jp, dm-devel redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, jmoyer redhat com, jens axboe oracle com, nauman google com, vgoyal redhat com, balbir linux vnet ibm com
- Subject: [dm-devel] Re: dm-ioband: Test results.
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:44:21 +0900 (JST)
Hi Alasdair,
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer redhat com>
Subject: Re: dm-ioband: Test results.
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:18:06 -0400
> Why is it that you repeatedly ignore concern/discussion about your
> determination to continue using a custom grouping mechanism? It is this
> type of excess layering that serves no purpose other than to facilitate
> out-of-tree use-cases. dm-ioband would take a big step closer to being
> merged upstream if you took others' feedback and showed more willingness
> to work through the outstanding issues.
Could you please let me know your opinion about merging dm-ioband
upstream? What do I have to do in order to merge dm-ioband?
Thanks,
Ryo Tsuruta
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]