[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] Re: New kernel shared snapshots
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>
- To: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>, Milan Broz <mbroz redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: New kernel shared snapshots
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:02:36 -0400
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:43:33AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> I mean, if I have function
> static struct some_structure *some_function(int a, int b, int c,
> int d, long long e,
> struct blablabla *p)
Don't align additional paramter lines to after the opening brace,
but always two tabs from column zero, e.g.
static struct some_structure *some_function(int a, int b, int c,
int d, long long e, struct blablabla *p)
also much easier to edit, especially if the function name and/or return
type changes.
And yes, except maye for printks absolutely stick to the 80 column
limit, it's an absolute pain to read otherwise.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]