[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] dm-replicator: introduce new remote replication target
- From: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm redhat com>
- To: device-mapper development <dm-devel redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] dm-replicator: introduce new remote replication target
- Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:03:08 +0100
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 05:39 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 12:42:27PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Could I just echo Lars' statement. With the upstream inclusion of drbd,
> > dm-replicator becomes a *third* replication system asking to be in
> > kernel. It is definitely a kernel policy question of whether we want
> > three separate replicators, and so should be Cc'd to lkml so that people
> > interested in that can weigh in.
>
> And unliley the previous two this one actually offers the benefit of
> beeing integrated with our major block device management framework.
Yes.
Plus it removes the 3 site limitation (2048 technical limit) and offers
consistent multi-device replication.
>
> Interesting that the question comes up now after I was shot down for it
> in the drbd discussion.
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]