[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina suse cz>
- To: Paul Mundt <lethal linux-sh org>
- Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier gmail com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, dm-devel redhat com, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka redhat com>, Am?rico Wang <xiyou wangcong gmail com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds linux-foundation org>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:10:44 +0100 (CET)
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > Example picked totally at random:
> >
> > set_le_ih_k_offset(ih,
> > le_ih_k_offset(ih) +
> > (tb->
> > lbytes <<
> > (is_indirect_le_ih
> > (ih) ? tb->tb_sb->
> > s_blocksize_bits -
> > UNFM_P_SHIFT :
> > 0)));
> >
> > See how everything is nicely aligned to 80 cols?
> >
> >
> > Generally, don't look at this function after having a good lunch you want
> > to keep. You have been warned.
> >
> This isn't a valid example, as it wasn't written by a human. This is the
> result of Lindent being run blindly on the file and nothing more.
>
> Try again.
But having hard rule imposed on everyone to stick with 80-char rule makes
people to do exactly this kind of things (blindly running indent -l80 and
believing that it makes the code more readable because it is
CodingStyle-compliant(tm)).
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]